SlimSet Official Website › Reviews
ReviewsSlimSet Reviews
The distributor publishes 4.8 out of 5 from 794 written reviews against 5,855 orders, with 89% recommending.
Its roster names 8 buyers and carries 3 distinct comment texts between them, so this page prints the roster whole and counts the themes rather than presenting eight separate accounts.
Every figure the distributor published, with the sums it does not show worked out underneath.
Who counted the SlimSet reviews, and what each figure counts
Four published numbers, each with its own denominator.
Four numbers travel with this product and all four come from the same place. Knowing what each one is a count of is the difference between reading them and being persuaded by them.
| The figure | What it counts | What it does not count |
|---|---|---|
| 4.8 out of 5 | The mean score across the written reviews the seller holds. | An audited rating held by an independent review platform outside the seller. |
| 794 written reviews | Buyers who left text of some kind, on the seller’s own tally. | Purchases confirmed one by one against a payment record by anyone outside the seller. |
| 5,855 orders | Orders placed, on the same tally. A useful denominator for the figure above it. | Bottles taken. An order is a purchase, not a course of capsules finished. |
| 89% recommending | Buyers answering a recommendation question, however it was worded. | The same population as the star split, necessarily. The two are separate questions. |
All four are the distributor’s own summary figures. None is a verified transcript and none is evidence that the formula works.
One ratio is worth doing. 794 written reviews against 5,855 orders is a write rate of about 14 per cent, which is high for a supplement and normal for a funnel that asks. It is not a mark against the figures; it is context for how they were gathered.
A second one is worth doing too. The published star split puts 66 per cent at five stars and 21 per cent at four, which totals 87 per cent at four or five, against 89% recommending. Those are close and they are not the same question, so the two-point gap is unremarkable rather than suspicious.
The SlimSet roster the distributor supplies
Eight rows as the seller sends them, before any reading of them.
Eight named buyers, with 3 distinct comment texts shared between them. Printed as supplied, in full, because a roster that gets edited on the way to a page stops being a roster.
| Buyer | Where | Rating | Bought | Reported at | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marcus S., 66 | Chicago, IL | ★★★★★ | 6 bottles | day 58 | Daily habit stuck. Reordered before the last bottle. |
| Stan G., 61 | Cleveland, OH | ★★★ | 3 bottles | day 16 | Wanted a faster change. Called the desk. Stopped at two. |
| Dennis N., 42 | Boston, MA | ★★★★★ | 3 bottles | day 60 | Daily habit stuck. Reordered before the last bottle. |
| Ray R., 51 | Minneapolis, MN | ★★★★★ | 2 bottles | day 60 | Daily habit stuck. Reordered before the last bottle. |
| Bill B., 63 | Atlanta, GA | ★★★★ | 6 bottles | day 39 | Fair at a month. Wanted more in week one. |
| Mark T., 57 | Denver, CO | ★★★★★ | 6 bottles | day 60 | Daily habit stuck. Reordered before the last bottle. |
| Ted N., 61 | Houston, TX | ★★★★ | 6 bottles | day 31 | Fair at a month. Wanted more in week one. |
| Frank L., 54 | Dallas, TX | ★★★★ | 3 bottles | day 33 | Fair at a month. Wanted more in week one. |
Supplied by the distributor as summary copy. Not verified transcripts, and not evidence that the product works.
The three recurring lines, verbatim: “Daily capsule.” (Marcus, 66); “Wait past week two.” (Stan, 61); “Desk answered.” (Bill, 63).
What the SlimSet roster does and does not represent
Five checks anyone can run on the eight rows above.
Eight rows carrying figures can be added up, and adding them up is the fastest way to understand what kind of document this is.
| Check | On the roster | In the published summary | What follows |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean rating | 4.375 out of 5 | 4.8 out of 5 | The eight rows are not a proportional sample of the whole. Nobody said they were, and reading them as one would be the error. |
| Five-star share | 4 of 8, which is 50 per cent | 66 per cent | Same conclusion from a different angle. |
| Lowest rating present | 3 stars, once | 2 and 1 star exist in the split | The roster contains no one and two-star row at all, so the least happy buyers in the summary are unrepresented in it. |
| Distinct comment texts | 3 across 8 rows | Not published | Three texts shared among eight names is summary copy rather than eight separate accounts. |
| Pack sizes named | One row records a 2 bottles purchase | The ladder sells one, three and six | A pack the ladder does not sell appears on the roster. The cleanest single reminder of what this table is. |
Every figure in the second column is counted off the eight rows above. Nothing here is an accusation; it is what the document is.
Prints it, counts it, and declines to convert it into structured review data. There is no per-person review markup anywhere on this website and no second aggregate rating: eight names sharing three comment texts would become eight separate testimonials in a search result, which would claim a great deal more for the document than the document is.
The three SlimSet themes, counted
Three texts, counted across eight rows, with the reported day on each.
Since three texts are shared between eight names, the honest presentation is a count rather than a wall of quotation marks.
“Daily habit stuck. Reordered before the last bottle.”
4 of 8 rows. The habit theme, and the one attached to every five-star row on the roster. The reported days cluster at 58 to 60, which is the end of the guarantee window rather than a milestone in anybody’s biology.
“Fair at a month. Wanted more in week one.”
3 of 8 rows. The mid theme, attached to the three four-star rows, with reported days between 31 and 39. It is a fair description of what this panel would produce: one row acts within hours and four have no published amount to act at.
“Wanted a faster change. Called the desk. Stopped at two.”
1 of 8 rows. The single dissenting row, reported at day 16, which is inside the first fortnight. It is also the row that records a call to the desk, and the desk is the channel that handles a refund.
Read against the panel, that distribution is coherent rather than surprising. The people who stayed describe a routine; the person who left describes an expectation the first fortnight did not meet. A capsule carrying 138 mg of caffeine and four botanical rows at token amounts would produce exactly that shape of feedback, and it is the shape the results timeline is built around.
How this desk handles SlimSet review data
Six rules, applied to every review figure on this website.
- Nothing is added. The eight rows above are the whole roster the distributor supplies. No reviewer on this website was written by anyone here.
- Nothing is removed. The three-star row, the dissenting comment and the two-bottle purchase are all printed, because a roster with the awkward row taken out is an advertisement.
- No per-person review markup. Three comment texts across eight names are not eight accounts, and search results should not be told that they are.
- One aggregate figure, in one place. The distributor’s score sits on the product record and is described as the distributor’s. It is not restated as a second rating on this page.
- The arithmetic is shown rather than asserted. Every figure in the table above this one can be recounted from the roster in about a minute.
- Corrections are welcome and go on the page. Write to [email protected] and the review date moves forward with the correction.
None of this makes the roster evidence. It makes it a legible document, which is a lower bar and the only one available. The evidence about what is in the bottle is on the ingredients page, where every figure links to a published record a reader can open.
SlimSet review questions
What do SlimSet reviews say?
The distributor publishes 4.8 out of 5 from 794 written reviews against 5,855 orders, with 89% recommending. Its roster of eight named buyers carries three distinct comment texts between them.
Are the reviews verified?
They are the seller’s own summary figures rather than audited transcripts held by an independent platform. This website labels them as such everywhere they appear.
Why are there no individual review cards?
Because three comment texts are shared across eight names. Presenting them as eight separate accounts, in markup or on the page, would claim more for the roster than the roster is.
Does the roster match the published score?
No. The eight rows average 4.38 against a published 4.8, and 50 per cent of them are five-star against a published 66 per cent. It is an illustration rather than a sample.
What is the most common complaint?
a slow start, and wanting more inside the first week. That is what this panel would predict: one row acts within hours and four have no published human amount to act at.
Can I leave a review here?
This website does not collect reviews. Corrections to what is published here go to [email protected] and are made on the page itself.
Sources that outrank any SlimSet review
Four published records about the ingredients, which are checkable in a way a roster is not.
- Dulloo AG, Geissler CA, Horton T, Collins A, Miller DS. Normal caffeine consumption: influence on thermogenesis and daily energy expenditure in lean and postobese human volunteers. Am J Clin Nutr. 1989;49(1):44-50. PMID 2912010. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2912010/
- Jurgens TM, Whelan AM, Killian L, Doucette S, Kirk S, Foy E. Green tea for weight loss and weight maintenance in overweight or obese adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;12(12):CD008650. PMID 23235664. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23235664/
- Heymsfield SB, Allison DB, Vasselli JR, et al. Garcinia cambogia (hydroxycitric acid) as a potential antiobesity agent: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1998;280(18):1596-600. PMID 9820262. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9820262/
- Arent SM, Walker AJ, Pellegrino JK, et al. The Combined Effects of Exercise, Diet, and a Multi-Ingredient Dietary Supplement on Body Composition and Adipokine Changes in Overweight Adults. J Am Coll Nutr. 2018;37(2):111-120. PMID 29111889. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29111889/
Order SlimSet and produce the only review that is yours
One bottle is 30 capsules and a month, and the 60-day window is long enough to reach an answer of your own.
One bottle $89 · six bottles $294 · 60-day money-back guarantee
Order SlimSet On The Official WebsiteOne capsule a day · 30 per bottle · lot SLI-26/GE-8193
